What's really disturbing, though, is that the various distillations of this ten-minute ceremony have been so inconsistent. The BBC (embedding forbidden) chose to include the bit about the scientific process; the AP, however, chose to include the bit about the false dichotomy between science and values. That says far too much about "news values."
Law and reality in publishing and entertainment (seldom the same thing) from the creator's side of the slush pile, with occasional forays into politics, military affairs, censorship and the First Amendment, legal theory, and anything else that strikes me as interesting. |
---|
09 March 2009
Hope After Ignorance
at
19:02
[UTC8]
There's a lot going on at the moment, including bronchitis (thus the recent silence here frog has my throat, not cat had my tongue). Today's main story, though, is simple: We have a resident of the White House who can actually spell "scientific method." We haven't had that since 1980 (Clinton was a lot better at lip service than at allowing science to inform, let alone influence, his policy preferences), and that was at best a secondary effect from an engineer's passing acquaintance with science.
Labels:
mass media,
politics,
science