null  
[self-portrait]Scrivener's Error Law and reality in publishing (seldom the same thing) from the author's side of the slush pile, with occasional forays into military affairs, censorship and the First Amendment, legal theory, and anything else that strikes me as interesting.
27 October 2010

link to: 11:58 [GMT-6]

Street Fightin' Men

 

This is just surreal: The Hells Angels have filed a lawsuit against Saks Fifth Avenue, among others... for trademark infringement. The complaint (PDF) is, itself, not very remarkable; further, on the basis of the attachments, it's going to survive any motion to dismiss and most motions for summary judgment. It's a dry, lawyerly complaint; but that's just the beginning of the surrealism.

To begin with, note the specific description of the Hells Angels:

4. Plaintiff HELLS ANGELS MOTORCYCLE CLUB ("HAMC") is now, and at all relevant times was, a non-profit mutual benefit corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of California. Plaintiff HAMC is the owner of the trademarks described herein, which it administers on behalf of, and for the benefit of, the Hells Angels Motorcycle Club.

It just gets better as the complaint goes on to describe the incontestable trademark registrations; the infringing items; and so on... without ever stating what, precisely, is being diluted or otherwise infringed.

It's not quite as amusing as the thought of serving brownies at a rally for Proposition 19, but it's close.

Labels: , ,

Ritual disclaimer: This blog contains legal commentary, but it is only general commentary. It does not constitute legal advice for your situation. It does not create an attorney-client relationship or any other expectation of confidentiality, nor is it an offer of representation.

All material © 2003–12 except where otherwise indicated. All rights reserved. This blawg does not use the Creative Commons License, although I'm usually pretty good-natured about permissions for attributed reuse.

I approve of no advertising appearing on or through syndication for anything other than the syndication itself; any such advertising violates the limited reuse license implied by voluntarily including syndication code on this blawg, and I do not approve aggregators and syndicators whose page design reflects only an intent to use the reference(s) to this blawg without actually providing the content from this blawg.

Internet link sausages, as frequently appear here, are gathered from uninspected meaty internet products and byproducts via processes you really, really don't want to observe; spiced with my own secret, snarky, sarcastic blend; quite possibly extended with sawdust or other indigestibles; and stuffed into your monitor (instead of either real or artificial casings). They're sort of like "link salad" or "pot pourri" or "miscellaneous musings" (or, for that matter, "making law"), but far more disturbing.

I am not responsible for any changes to your lipid counts or blood pressure from consuming these sausages... nor for your monitor if you insist on covering them with mash or sauce.

Archives  

Now live at the new site. I have arranged some of the more infamous threads that have appeared here by unravelling them from the blawg tapestry (and hopefully eliminating some of the sillier typos). Sometimes, the threads have been slightly reordered for clarity.

   

Links open in a new window.

These may be of interest; I do not necessarily agree with opinions expressed in them, although the reasoning and writing are almost always first-rate (and represent a standard seldom, if ever, achieved in "mainstream" journalism). I'm picky, and have eclectic tastes, so don't expect a comprehensive listing.

A blawg is sort of like a blog on legal issues, but usually has a lot more links to outside resources (other than other blogs) than does a typical blog. Scrivener's Error is a blawg, not just a blog. You can find other blawgs at < ? law blogs # >.

Searches

   www blogspot radio.weblogs
U.S.C. §
U.S.

 

Powered by Blogger
 
 

Optimized for Firefox 3.0 at 1024x768.